How to Choose the Right AWS Storage for Your Application
"Storage" is no longer just about where you put your files. It’s about latency, throughput, concurrency, and most importantly cost optimization. Many teams defaults to Amazon S3 for everything, only to realize later that their application's performance is bottlenecked or their monthly bill is skyrocketing.
Choosing the right storage service is a strategic decision that affects your app's scalability and your company's bottom line. Let's break down the "Big Three" of AWS storage.
Read the Full article here@ https://teleglobals.com/blog/choosing-the-right-aws-storage-service-for-your-application
1. Amazon S3: The Versatile Giant (Object Storage)
Best For: Static assets, data lakes, backups, and large-scale unstructured data.
The Pro: Virtually unlimited scale and 11 nines of durability. It’s the most cost-effective for "cold" or "warm" data.
The Trap: High latency for random-access patterns. If your app needs to frequently update small parts of a file, S3 is not your friend.
Key Decision Point: Use S3 when your data is accessed via API/HTTP and doesn't require a traditional file system.
2. Amazon EBS: The High-Performance Workhorse (Block Storage)
Best For: Databases (RDS), boot volumes for EC2, and transactional workloads.
The Pro: Low-latency, high-IOPS performance. It behaves exactly like a physical hard drive attached to your server.
The Trap: It’s "attached" storage. Usually, only one EC2 instance can talk to a standard EBS volume at a time.
Key Decision Point: Use EBS when you need consistent, sub-millisecond latency for a single instance.
3. Amazon EFS: The Seamless Sharer (File Storage)
Best For: Content management systems (WordPress), media processing, and containerized apps (EKS/ECS).
The Pro: It’s a managed NFS (Network File System). Thousands of instances can read and write to the same data simultaneously. It grows and shrinks automatically.
The Trap: Higher cost per GB compared to S3 and potentially higher latency than EBS.
Key Decision Point: Use EFS when you have a distributed architecture where multiple servers need to share the same file state.
Summary Comparison Table
| Feature | Amazon S3 | Amazon EBS | Amazon EFS |
| Storage Type | Object | Block | File |
| Access | Web / API | Single EC2 Instance | Multiple Instances |
| Scalability | Automatic / Infinite | Manual Provisioning | Automatic |
| Performance | High Throughput | Lowest Latency | Scalable Throughput |
COnnect with Expert to choose your Stroage type@ https://teleglobals.com/contact-us
Conclusion
Architecture is about trade-offs.
Need Scale & Low Cost? Go S3.
Need Raw Speed for a Database? Go EBS.
Need Shared Access for Microservices? Go EFS.
What’s your biggest challenge when managing AWS storage costs?
.jpg)
Comments
Post a Comment